<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FB Series: Integrating JS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uebersoftware.com/2009/07/fb-series-integrating-js/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uebersoftware.com/2009/07/fb-series-integrating-js/</link>
	<description>Opinions and thoughts on Software and Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:38:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.uebersoftware.com/2009/07/fb-series-integrating-js/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uebersoftware.com/2009/07/fb-series-integrating-js/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>After getting down to dirt with JQuery and YUI for a week here a good summary of advantages / disadvantages:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;jQuery Advantages:&lt;br /&gt;- Core has good performance&lt;br /&gt;- Simple to learn and use&lt;br /&gt;- Small amount of code required to do things&lt;br /&gt;- Lots of plug-ins (also a disadvantage)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;jQuery Disadvantages:&lt;br /&gt;- Specific syntax that needs to be learned (although it is pretty simple)&lt;br /&gt;- Not a cohesive solution&lt;br /&gt;- Lots of plug-ins – Requires a lot of time to choose what you need and most plug-ins a hack-jobs that are not very well supported. There is no consistency in the look and feel of plugins. Not all plugins work properly in different browsers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;YUI Advantages:&lt;br /&gt;- Complete Cohesive Solution – Just what you need when building serious web applications. Consistency in the look and feel of widgets (They all look and operate the same)&lt;br /&gt;- Enterprise backed&lt;br /&gt;- Javascript without it’s own syntax&lt;br /&gt;- More complete, cohesive examples for each widget&lt;br /&gt;- More supporting tools around the framework&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;YUI Disadvantages:&lt;br /&gt;- Requires more code to implement functionality&lt;br /&gt;- Selector is supposedly slower than jQuery, but then the latest version havn’t been compared&lt;br /&gt;- Fewer plug-ins on top of what’s already there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After getting down to dirt with JQuery and YUI for a week here a good summary of advantages / disadvantages:</p>
<p>jQuery Advantages:<br />- Core has good performance<br />- Simple to learn and use<br />- Small amount of code required to do things<br />- Lots of plug-ins (also a disadvantage)</p>
<p>jQuery Disadvantages:<br />- Specific syntax that needs to be learned (although it is pretty simple)<br />- Not a cohesive solution<br />- Lots of plug-ins – Requires a lot of time to choose what you need and most plug-ins a hack-jobs that are not very well supported. There is no consistency in the look and feel of plugins. Not all plugins work properly in different browsers.</p>
<p>YUI Advantages:<br />- Complete Cohesive Solution – Just what you need when building serious web applications. Consistency in the look and feel of widgets (They all look and operate the same)<br />- Enterprise backed<br />- Javascript without it’s own syntax<br />- More complete, cohesive examples for each widget<br />- More supporting tools around the framework</p>
<p>YUI Disadvantages:<br />- Requires more code to implement functionality<br />- Selector is supposedly slower than jQuery, but then the latest version havn’t been compared<br />- Fewer plug-ins on top of what’s already there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
